Geo modeling QC
1.GOOD QC
- •Visualize your data
- •Check before moving to next stage in workflow
- •Work in multi disciplinary team – ask!
- •Make 2D maps
- •Look at statistics - averages, SD, min, max
- •Make cross plots
- •Compare against simple deterministic and other calculations
2.WHAT IS MODEL BEING USED FOR?
- •Determine goals for the project first as this will determine level of accuracy and QC required
- •Volumetrics model may require
- high level of QC
3.LOADING DATA
- •Generally few problems
- •View data
- –Raw logs
- –Structure maps in 3D
- –Fault sticks etc
- •Ideally fix data at source (LANDMARK), not in IRAP
4.BUILDING GRID
- •QC grid
- –look through slices
- –Run QC job in IRAP
- –Simulation grid export to Sensor and discuss with RE first
- •Lots of options, so decide what is grid being used for first!
5.BLOCKING WELL DATA
- •First step in upscaling process
- •Look at statistics before and after upscaling, for all wells, and individual wells
- •Can use bias to correct for any sampling bias of facies
- •Block Porosity using facies weighted arithmetic average
- •Block permeability using arithmetic, geometric or harmonic – it depends!
- •Run single well models with RE to check blocking and grid size is working ok
6.FACIES MODELS – (NTG)
- •Look at blocked and raw log facies proportions to determine facies%
- •Use body logs for stacked facies
- •Must consider impact of well sampling and trends being used in model
- •Are models slow to condition to well data?
- •Look at body thickness wrt to well data, and grid size
- •Look at vertical distribution of facies
- •Be careful when combining/merging facies models – are proportions maintained correctly
- •Well data has 66% sand facies
- •What facies proportion should you apply in model?
8.Example Distribution of facies, and stacked facies
- •Is there a vertical trend?
- •Are reservoir bodies stacked?
9.PETROPHYSICS
- •Fraught with dangers!
- •Can apply lots of complex transformations
- •ALWAYS CHECK DISTRIBUTION OF RAW LOG, BLOCK WELL, AND MODEL DATA AND COMPARE, may also compare core data
- •Make some maps = average porosity, net pay
- •Can use pseudo wells to compare against actual wells
10.UPSCALING
- •Fraught with dangers!
- •Set unresolved cells to -999 to view where problems
- •Use layered resampling when possible
- •Look at statistics of fine grid and upscaled
- •Compare volumetrics – should be <2%>
- •Run flow simulation of fine scale sector, and upscaled sector and compare first
- •Use net volume weighted arithmetic average for porosity
- •Use tensor or other methods for permeability
- •Use volume arithmetic average for NTG
11.Final comments
- •Don’t assume because the computer has calculated something it is done what you think – CHECK
- •More complex the model more chances of error
- •Check before going too far – can save a lot of wasted time
- •Visualize, make maps, and look at statistics
By
A. Anriansyah, dkk
(Dari coba2 & beberapa handsout)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar